Gibson

(PC) O'Brien v. Gibson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20241:21-cv-01574California849 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KORY T. O’BRIEN, No. 1:21-cv-01574 KES GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. (ECF No. 28) 14 CONNIE GIBSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Kory T. O’Brien is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 19 magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 11, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order identifying 21 deficiencies in several of Plaintiff’s claims. Doc. 25. The magistrate judge issued a clarifying 22 order on August 14, 2023, offering Plaintiff the opportunity (1) to file an amended complaint, 23 (2) to stand on the original complaint and proceed with the cognizable claims identified in the 24 screening order, or (3) to stand on the original complaint as written. Doc. 26. The August 11, 25 2023, screening order discussed, among other matters, that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.