Bandaru
(PC) Kelly v. Bandaru
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No. 2:24-cv-01161-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
14 BANDARU, et al., JUDGE TO THIS MATTER 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE
17 DENIED 18 ECF No. 2 19 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
20
21 22 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, 23 ECF No. 2. However, plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. 24 § 1915(g). See Kelly v. Sao, No. 1:19-cv-00681-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2019) 25 (recognizing plaintiff as a “three-striker” within in the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). 26 The court takes judicial notice of the following cases constituting strikes: (1) Kelly v. 27 …