Bandaru

(PC) Kelly v. Bandaru

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20242:24-cv-01161California841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No. 2:24-cv-01161-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

BANDARU, et al., JUDGE TO THIS MATTER Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED ECF No. 2 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

21 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. However, plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Kelly v. Sao, No. 1:19-cv-00681-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2019) (recognizing plaintiff as a “three-striker” within in the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). The court takes judicial notice of the following cases constituting strikes: (1) Kelly v. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.