Rhea

(PC) Brannigan v. Rhea

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20242:23-cv-00725California544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON R. BRANNIGAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-00725-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER RHEA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 30, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations but did file a second amended complaint without leave of court. ECF No. 17. The court construes that filing as an implied request for leave to amend and proposed amendment. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.