Jimenez

Jimenez v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20242:23-cv-03028California947 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOR JIMENEZ, individually and No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-KJN on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING

ORDER

v. HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, 16 Defendant. 17 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Statement, the Court hereby amends the Pretrial Scheduling Order. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All named Defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown. II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown. /// /// III. JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d)(2)(A). Jurisdiction and venue are not contested. 4 PHASE I - CLASS CERTIFICATION 6 IV. DISCOVERY The Court finds that bifurcation is necessary in order to best determine if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.