(PS) Jackson v. Experian Information Solution

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTICE JACKSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-00334-KJM-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

14 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 On January 29, 2024, plaintiff commenced this action against Experian Information 18 Solution, Equifax, Inc., and Transunion and paid the required filing fee. To date, defendants not 19 appeared in this action, and plaintiff has not filed proof of service demonstrating that defendants 20 were properly served.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). 21 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days 22 after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must 23 dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a 24 specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). However, “if the plaintiff shows good cause for the 25 failure, the court must extend the time for service for an…