(HC) Valdez-Chalchi v. Warden F.C.I. Herlong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20242:23-cv-00643California286 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE VALDEZ-CHALCHI, No. 2:23-cv-00643-DB 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 WARDEN F.C.I. HERLONG, 15 Respondent. 16 17 By order filed March 35, 2024, petitioner was directed to file a motion for in forma 18 pauperis or paid the required filing fee within thirty days. Thirty days from that date have now 19 passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended motion, or otherwise responded to the court’s 20 order. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 22 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 23 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 24 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.