Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20241:19-cv-00068California984 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00068-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS AGAINST CALIFORNIA

13 v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, REQUEST FOR

HIPPA HEARING, AND REQUEST FOR

14 JIMINEZ, et al., APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 80) 16 17 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Jimenez, Rodriguez, Huckleberry, Rye, 20 and Hernandez for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against the California 22 Attorney Generals, request for a HIPPA hearing to enable the Court to review Plaintiff’s mental 23 health file to establish the fact that he is a class member of Coleman/Plata/Armstrong, and request 24 for appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.