Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20241:19-cv-00068California984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00068-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS AGAINST CALIFORNIA

v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, REQUEST FOR

HIPPA HEARING, AND REQUEST FOR

JIMINEZ, et al., APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Defendants. (ECF No. 80) 16 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Jimenez, Rodriguez, Huckleberry, Rye, and Hernandez for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against the California Attorney Generals, request for a HIPPA hearing to enable the Court to review Plaintiff’s mental health file to establish the fact that he is a class member of Coleman/Plata/Armstrong, and request for appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.