Wellpath

(PC) Donley v. Wellpath

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20241:23-cv-01740California1,483 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SHAWN ARLIN DONLEY, No. 1:23-cv-01740-SAB (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

9 v. TO THIS ACTION 10 WELLPATH, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

11 Defendants. (ECF No. 14) 12 13 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 14 U.S.C. § 1983. 15 Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on December 20, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) 16 On February 26, 2024, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff stated a 17 cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants Dr. Gustavian, Medina, Debbie, 18 Eva, Michelle, Maria, Chloe, Alejandra, Victoria, Libby, and Jane Doe. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff 19 was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to 20 proceed only on the deliberate indifference claim. (Id.) Although Plaintiff sought and received…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.