Middleton

Middleton v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20241:19-cv-01747California6,292 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT MIDDLETON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01747-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED

MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA

13 v. SETTLEMENT AND ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT

14 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., (Doc. 39) 15 Defendant. Clerk of the Court to Close Case 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for approval of Private Attorneys 19 General Act (“PAGA”) Settlement, filed December 6, 2023. (Doc. 39). The motion is 20 accompanied by declarations from Plaintiff’s attorney, Karl Gerber, and from Jon D. Meer, 21 counsel for Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (“Halliburton or “Defendant”). (Docs. 40, 41).1 22 The Court finds that the terms of the settlement are fundamentally fair, adequate, and reasonable. 23 For the reasons set forth herein, the Court will reduce Plaintiff’s requested incentive award. 24 I. Background 25 On December 16, 2019, Robert Middleton (“Plaintiff”), initiated this action with the filing 26 of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.