(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20241:22-cv-00160California1,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, No. 1:22-cv-00160-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED

v. WITNESSES O.VALLADOLID, et al., (ECF No. 84) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is currently set for jury trial on August 6, 2024. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, filed April 11, 2024. (ECF No. 84.) Defendants filed an opposition on April 29, 2024. (ECF No. 86.) I. LEGAL STANDARD In determining whether to grant Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of his proposed witnesses, factors to be taken into consideration include (1) whether the inmate’s presence will substantially further the resolution of the case, (2) the security risks presented by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.