RLC Industries Co. v. Liberty Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20242:23-cv-00649California710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RLC INDUSTRIES CO. and ROSEBURG No. 2:23-cv-0649 TLN DB

FOREST PRODCUTS CO.,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. LIBERTY INSURANCE

CORPORATION,

16 Defendant. 18 As explained by the parties, this “insurance case concerns whether fees incurred by [plaintiff] in defending against” lawsuits related to the Mill Fire were reasonable and necessary. (JS (ECF No. 46-1) at 2.) On April 22, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel supplemental responses along with the parties’ Joint Statement. (ECF No. 46.) The motion is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on May 8, 2024, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 52.) Review of the Joint Statement finds that at issue are defendant’s responses to two interrogatories: Interrogatory No. 6 and Interrogatory No. 10. With respect to Interrogatory No. 10, defendant asserts that plaintiff’s arguments found in the Joint Statement “were not . . . the subject of . . . telephonic meet and confer conferences.” (JS (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.