Rosenburg

(PC) Van Huisen v. Rosenburg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20242:24-cv-00055California1,026 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUSIEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00055-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

CHUCK ROSENBURG, et al., DENIED Defendants. ECF Nos. 8 & 12 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint, ECF No. 7, and two requests to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 8 & 12. However, after a review of plaintiff’s filings in this district, it appears that plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (i.e., may not proceed in forma pauperis) “if the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.