Rosenburg
(PC) Van Huisen v. Rosenburg
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUSIEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00055-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE
14 CHUCK ROSENBURG, et al., DENIED 15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 8 & 12 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
17
18 19 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint, ECF No. 7, and two requests to proceed in 20 forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 8 & 12.1 However, after a review of plaintiff’s filings in this district, it 21 appears that plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 22 The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil 23 action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (i.e., may not 24 proceed in forma pauperis) “if the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions, while 25 incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or…