Rosenburg
(PC) Van Huisen v. Rosenburg
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUSIEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00055-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE
CHUCK ROSENBURG, et al., DENIED Defendants. ECF Nos. 8 & 12 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
18 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint, ECF No. 7, and two requests to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 8 & 12. However, after a review of plaintiff’s filings in this district, it appears that plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (i.e., may not proceed in forma pauperis) “if the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or…