Kernan

(PC) Meyers v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20241:22-cv-00539California7,788 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON LEE MEYERS, No. 1:22-cv-00539-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE

14 SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 48) 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for Plaintiff’s 19 failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, filed January 11, 2024. (ECF No. 48.) 20 I. 21 PROCEDURAL HISTORY 22 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendants Thomas, 23 Simpson, Aguilar, Espitia, Magdaleno, Medina, Denherder, Garza, and Bowlin, denial of access 24 to the courts claim against Defendant Bowlin, and conditions of confinement claim against 25 Defendants Espitia, Magdaleno, Nitescu,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.