Kernan
(PC) Meyers v. Kernan
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON LEE MEYERS, No. 1:22-cv-00539-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE
14 SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 48) 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for Plaintiff’s 19 failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, filed January 11, 2024. (ECF No. 48.) 20 I. 21 PROCEDURAL HISTORY 22 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendants Thomas, 23 Simpson, Aguilar, Espitia, Magdaleno, Medina, Denherder, Garza, and Bowlin, denial of access 24 to the courts claim against Defendant Bowlin, and conditions of confinement claim against 25 Defendants Espitia, Magdaleno, Nitescu,…