(SS) Kessler v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20242:23-cv-01416California5,834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA MARIE KESSLER, No. 2:23-cv-01416 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARTIN O’MALLEY, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. For the reasons that follow, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for supplemental security income on March 24, 2021. Administrative

SSI is paid to financially needy disabled persons. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371, 375 (2003) (“Title XVI of the Act, § 1381 et seq., is the Supplemental Security Income…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.