(PS) Brown v. Roseville City School District
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID BROWN, No. 2:23-cv-02256 DJC CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROSEVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action and paid the filing fee on October 5, 18 2023. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. 19 Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has opposed the motion, and defendants have filed a 20 reply. (ECF Nos. 10 & 11.) On December 4, 2023, the court took the matter under submission 21 without appearance and argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons 22 set forth below, the court will grant defendants’ motion with leave to amend. 23 I. The Complaint 24 Plaintiff, suing on behalf of himself and his minor child (RB), brings this action against 25 the Roseville City School District, its superintendent (Garcia) the principal of Cooley Middle 26 School (Ramirez), and a teacher (Caubin) at the school. ECF No.…