(PS) Brown v. Roseville City School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20242:23-cv-02256California2,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BROWN, No. 2:23-cv-02256 DJC CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROSEVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action and paid the filing fee on October 5, 2023. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has opposed the motion, and defendants have filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 10 & 11.) On December 4, 2023, the court took the matter under submission without appearance and argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant defendants’ motion with leave to amend. I. The Complaint Plaintiff, suing on behalf of himself and his minor child (RB), brings this action against the Roseville City School District, its superintendent (Garcia) the principal of Cooley Middle School (Ramirez), and a teacher (Caubin) at the school. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.