Dhillon

Akal Broadcasting Corp v. Dhillon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20241:24-cv-00029California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AKAL BROADCASTING CORP, et al. Case No. 1:24-cv-00029-JLT-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO PAY

SANCTIONS OF $50 PER DAY

v. (ECF No. 13) SUKHDEV SINGH DHILLON, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiffs initiated this action on January 5, 2024 against Defendants Sukhdev Singh Dhillon, Mohan S. Cheema, Tarnvir S. Bisla, Jagdeep S. Dhaliwal, Baaz Broadcasting Corp., Radio Punjab, Inc., Amar Broadcasting Inc., TEG Broadcasting Inc., and Radio Spice USA Inc. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs failed to file proof of service on any Defendants. The mandatory scheduling conference was initially set for April 23, 2024, and a joint scheduling report was due on April 16, 2024. (ECF No. 4.) No joint scheduling report was filed by April 16, 2024. Without a joint scheduling report, the Court issued an order on April 18, 2024 continuing the scheduling conference to May 21, 2024 and requiring that Plaintiffs file a status report no later than April 23, 2024 addressing the status of this action. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.