Dhillon
Akal Broadcasting Corp v. Dhillon
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 AKAL BROADCASTING CORP, et al. Case No. 1:24-cv-00029-JLT-SAB
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO PAY
SANCTIONS OF $50 PER DAY
13 v. (ECF No. 13) 14 SUKHDEV SINGH DHILLON, et al., 15 Defendants.
16 17 Plaintiffs initiated this action on January 5, 2024 against Defendants Sukhdev Singh 18 Dhillon, Mohan S. Cheema, Tarnvir S. Bisla, Jagdeep S. Dhaliwal, Baaz Broadcasting Corp., 19 Radio Punjab, Inc., Amar Broadcasting Inc., TEG Broadcasting Inc., and Radio Spice USA Inc. 20 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs failed to file proof of service on any Defendants. The mandatory 21 scheduling conference was initially set for April 23, 2024, and a joint scheduling report was due 22 on April 16, 2024. (ECF No. 4.) No joint scheduling report was filed by April 16, 2024. 23 Without a joint scheduling report, the Court issued an order on April 18, 2024 continuing 24 the scheduling conference to May 21, 2024 and requiring that Plaintiffs file a status report no 25 later than April 23, 2024 addressing the status of this action. …