Scotland

(PC) Moody v. Scotland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20242:22-cv-02020California312 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KAYSHON LAMONT MOODY, No. 2:22-cv-2020-TLN-DMC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 A. SCOTLAND, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 18 District of California local rules. 19 On February 22, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 21 within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 20.) The time to file objections has passed, and no 22 objections have been filed. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.