(PS) Shinshuri v. California Physicians' Services

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAMME SHINSHURI, No. 2:18-cv-03143-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS’ SERVICES dba Blue Shield of California, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action without counsel. The matter was referred to a United 18 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). 19 On April 3, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 21 filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 42.) The time to file objections has passed, and Plaintiff 22 did not file any objections. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district…