(PC) Landis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20241:23-cv-01490California790 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD HAROLD LANDIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01490-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. (ECF No. 10)

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

CORRECTIONS AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

15 REHABILITATION, et al., FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 11) 16 Defendants.

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiff Richard Harold Landis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On March 4, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to comply 21 with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20, failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, 22 and was filed prematurely without first exhausting Plaintiff’s administrative remedies. (ECF No. 23 8.) The Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint 24 or a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.