(PC) Landis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20241:23-cv-01490California790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD HAROLD LANDIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01490-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF No. 10)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

CORRECTIONS AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

REHABILITATION, et al., FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 11) Defendants.

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Richard Harold Landis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 4, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20, failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and was filed prematurely without first exhausting Plaintiff’s administrative remedies. (ECF No. 8.) The Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint or a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.