Britt
Britt v. Lennar Corporation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANCHESKA BRITT, on behalf of the No. 1:23-cv-01475-KES-BAM State of California as a private attorney 12 general, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S
14 v. INDIVIDUAL PAGA CLAIM TO
ARBITRATION, DENYING MOTION TO
15 LENNAR CORPORATION et al., DISMISS, AND STAYING CASE AS TO
REMAINING CLAIMS
16 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 6, 28) 17
18 19 20 This matter is before the court on (1) the motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, to stay, 21 and (2) the motion to compel arbitration and dismiss, or in the alternative, to stay filed by Lennar 22 Corporation and Lennar Sales Corporation (collectively “defendants”) on November 8, 2023, and 23 March 29, 2024, respectively. (Doc. Nos. 6, 28.) The court took both motions under submission 24 on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. Nos. 16, 33.) For the reasons explained 25 below, the court will grant defendants’ motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s individual 26 PAGA…