Diaz
Diaz v. City of Merced
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
William L. Schmidt, SBN 206870 Email: legal.schmidt@gmail.com
WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT, ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C.
PO Box 25001 3 Fresno, CA 93729 Tel: 559.261.2222
Attorney for Plaintiff : Armando Diaz
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 9 ARMANDO DIAZ, No. 1:23-CV-00065-JLT-SKO
Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO MODIFY v. SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER The CITY OF MERCED, CODY
MCCOMB, NICOLAS DEJON,
DOMINIC SAELEE, and DOES 1-15, inclusive,
Defendants.
17 Pursuant to Local Rule 143 the parties stipulate and ask the Court to Order that the 18 scheduling order entered on February 5, 2024 (ECF No. 14) be modified by extending the 19 discovery deadlines. The court granted one 60-day modification of discovery deadlines 20 previously. (ECF 14) 21 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” 22 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal 23 quotation marks omitted. Rule 16(b) provides that “[a]…