Snyder

(PS) Lintvelt v. Snyder

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20242:23-cv-02253California3,965 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ABRAHAM LINTVELT, No. 2:23-cv-2253-DJC-CSK PS 13 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 v. (ECF Nos. 9, 12, 18.) 15 KENNETH SNYDER, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Abraham Lintvelt, who proceeds without the aid of counsel, alleges 19 Defendant California Highway Patrol (CHP) Officer Kenneth Snyder violated Plaintiff’s 20 Fourth Amendment rights during a March 2019 traffic stop.1 (ECF No. 1.) Defendant now 21 moves for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the 22 statute of limitations. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff opposes the motion and separately submits 23 an amended complaint, which the Court construed as a motion to amend his Complaint. 24 (ECF Nos. 12, 13.) The Court took the motions under submission without a hearing. 25 (ECF No. 17.) 26 For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Defendant’s motion for 27 1 This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. 28 R. Civ. P 72, and Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.