Snyder

(PS) Lintvelt v. Snyder

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20242:23-cv-02253California3,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ABRAHAM LINTVELT, No. 2:23-cv-2253-DJC-CSK PS Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF Nos. 9, 12, 18.) KENNETH SNYDER, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Abraham Lintvelt, who proceeds without the aid of counsel, alleges Defendant California Highway Patrol (CHP) Officer Kenneth Snyder violated Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights during a March 2019 traffic stop.1 (ECF No. 1.) Defendant now moves for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff opposes the motion and separately submits an amended complaint, which the Court construed as a motion to amend his Complaint. (ECF Nos. 12, 13.) The Court took the motions under submission without a hearing. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Defendant’s motion for 27 This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P 72, and Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.