(PC) Kauth v. Tule River Tribal Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20241:23-cv-01731California1,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH VINCENT KAUTH, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01731-KES-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUESTS FOR FUNDING

v. (Doc. 12) TULE RIVER TRIBAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Joseph Vincent Kauth is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was filed April 25, 2024, and is pending screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). On May 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed documents titled “Request for Funding for Phone Cards and Declaration of Indigent” and “Request for Funding and Declaration of Indigent.” (Doc. 12.) The first document requests “funding to purchase $40.00 per week phone cards … to seek and hire investigators, to seek and hire experts and maintain contact with defense witnesses” and “to establish a runner to adequately prepare a defense.” (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff indicates he is incarcerated at the Tulare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.