CA Coastkeeper Alliance v. Cosumnes Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20242:20-cv-01703California976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER No. 2:20-cv-1703 DB

ALLIANCE,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. COSUMNES CORPORATION dba

MURIETA EQUESTRIAN CENTER,

16 Defendant. 18 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. See U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter has been reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. On April 5, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint and noticed the motion for hearing on May 10, 2024. (ECF No. 113.) On April 5, 2024, plaintiff filed a notice of request to seal. (ECF No. 114.) On April 12, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 115.) On April 19, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion in limine to exclude expert testimony. (ECF No. 118.) Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and motion in limine are noticed for hearing on May 24, 2024. (ECF Nos. 118 & 122.) On May 2, 2024, plaintiff filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.