Covello
(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20242:23-cv-02394California1,267 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVIER ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-02394-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. THAT PLAINTIFF INDICATE HIS
INTENT TO PROCEED ONLY WITH THE
PATRICK COVELLO, et al., CLAIMS DEEMED COGNIZABLE IN
THIS ORDER OR FILE ANOTHER
Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 10 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE ECF No. 12 21 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendant R. Decker, a correctional officer, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by using excessive force against him. ECF No. 10 at 3-4. After reviewing the operative amended complaint, I find this claim cognizable. The complaint fails, however, to state a viable claim against any other defendant. Plaintiff may either proceed only with his…