Desantis
(PC) Van Huisen v. Desantis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 GREGORY S. VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-1758 WBS CSK Plaintiff, Ninth Circuit No. 24-2616 v. ORDER RON DESANTIS, et al., Defendants. 17 ----oo0oo---- After the court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations and dismissed the case, plaintiff appealed. (See Docket Nos. 25, 29, 38.) The Ninth Circuit has now referred the matter back to this court “for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). (Docket No. 55.) For the reasons discussed in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations, and as found in the court’s order —_——— eI IERIE RIE IRIE ES EIEIO
adopting those Findings and …