Dias

Dias v. Avila

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20241:24-cv-00354California5,065 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 SEAN DIAS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00354-SAB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

14 WILLIAM AVILA, et al., COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN THIS

MATTER TO A DISTRICT JUDGE

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 4) 16

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-

17 ONE (21) DAYS

18 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the 20 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 4.) 21 Following amendment of the Local Rules effective March 1, 2022, a certain percentage 22 of civil cases shall be directly assigned to a Magistrate Judge only, with consent or declination of 23 consent forms due within 90 days from the date of filing of the action. L.R. App. A(m)(1). This 24 action has been directly assigned to a Magistrate Judge only. Not all parties have appeared or 25 filed consent or declination of consent forms in this action yet. Pursuant …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.