(PC) Buckner v. Sacramento Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20242:23-cv-01723California444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRELL ONEIL BUCKNER, No. 2:23-cv-01723-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 28, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 10. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff appealed the order to the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 12. On February 29, 2024, that court dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. ECF No. 15. On March 5, 2024, this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.