(PC) Bosley v. Truckee Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20242:23-cv-02994California999 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACOB M. BOSLEY, Case No. 2:23-cv-02994-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER FINDING THAT THE

COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A

13 v. VIABLE CLAIM AND GRANTING

LEAVE TO AMEND

14 TRUCKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ECF No. 1 15 Defendant.

ORDER

16

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

17 TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 18 ECF No. 5 19 20 21 Plaintiff brings this action against the Truckee Police Department and alleges that criminal 22 charges have wrongly been brought against him in state court. ECF No. 1 at 3. I find, for the 23 reasons stated below, that the court should abstain from hearing his claims under the abstention 24 doctrine in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S. Ct. 746 (1971). Rather than recommend 25 immediate dismissal, I will give plaintiff an opportunity to amend and to explain why his claims 26 are not barred by Younger. I will also grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.