Leekie
(PC) Peterson v. Leekie
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD KEMONI PETERSON, Case No. 2:23-cv-01348-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. FINDING THAT THE AMENDED
COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A
F. LEEKIE, et al., COGNIZABLE CLAIM Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE
CLAIM ECF No. 16 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this action against defendants and alleges that they violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they failed to address a watery floor that caused him to slip and injure himself. ECF No. 16 at 4-5. As in my previous screening order, I find that plaintiff has not stated cognizable § 1983 claims. See ECF No. 9. I now recommend this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
27 28 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements …