Miller v. Ford Motor Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20242:20-cv-01796California3,139 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VANESSA MILLER, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01796-DAD-CKD 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the 18 parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 104) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] 19 with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before 20 issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the court 21 hereby issues this scheduling order. 22 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 23 The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. 24 No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 26 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 27 The parties do not anticipate the joinder of additional parties or amendment of the 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.