Hurtado

(PC) Adkins v. Hurtado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20242:21-cv-00531California1,330 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00531-DJC-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

DISQUALIFY AND GRANTING

14 DAVID HURTADO, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 82 & 93 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

18 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BE

DENIED

19 ECF No. 83 20

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

21 DAYS 22 Plaintiff brought this § 1983 case against defendants David Hurtado and E. Marshak, 23 alleging that he was denied access to the law library when similarly situated white inmates were 24 not. Pending are plaintiff’s motion to disqualify and request for preliminary injunctive relief. 25 ECF Nos. 82 & 83. For the reasons stated hereafter, these motions should be denied. Also 26 pending is defendants’ motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.