Scheafer

Scheafer v. Target Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20242:24-cv-00651California1,810 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BYRON SCHEAFER, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00651-DJC-DB 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 13 TARGET CORPORATION, 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 17 The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of the Court, good cause 19 having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 20 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 21 No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without 22 leave of the Court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson 23 v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 1992). 24 III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 25 Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case or that do not 26 relate to sealing or redaction of documents related to dispositive motions are referred 27 to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, who will hear all discovery disputes 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.