Pruitt

(PC) Malcolm Stroud v. Pruitt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20241:17-cv-01659California1,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALCOLM TANDY LAMON STROUD, Case No. 1:17-cv-01659-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE TO RE-FILING (ECF No. 52) TED PRUITT, et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

Defendants. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 52)

17 Plaintiff Malcolm Tandy Lamon Stroud, aka Treasure Stroud, (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Pruitt for sexual abuse in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Pruitt and Smith for discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and request for appointment of counsel, filed May 6, 2024. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.