Wong
(PC) Hamilton v. Wong
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 David Hamilton, No. 2:19-cv-01181-KJM-EFB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Sam Wong, et. al., 1S Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 | under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 15. On June 22, 2020, the court 19 | dismissed this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Prior Order, 20 | ECF No. 20. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the court’s dismissal. See USCA Mandate, ECF No. 28. 21 Plaintiff has filed a motion entitled “Notice of Motion for Modification of Sentence to 22 | Vacate Judgement of Court-Imposed Costs (Fines and Restitution) (Pen. Code § 1465.9).” Mot. 23 | at 1, ECF No. 29 (emphasis omitted). Plaintiff argues California Penal Code section 1465.9 has 24 | been amended to render court-imposed costs “unenforceable and uncollectible.” /d. at 3. 25 | Therefore, he requests all court-imposed costs to…