Estate of Sherrano Stingley v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20242:23-cv-00255California2,514 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTATE OF SHERRANO STINGLEY, et No. 2:23-cv-00255-TLN-AC al., 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17

18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Sacramento, Sacramento County 20 Sherriff’s Department, and Scott Jones’s, in his official capacity as Sacramento County Sheriff, 21 (collectively, “Defendants”) Request for Reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s September 27, 22 2023, Order. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiffs Estate of Sherrano Stingley, Dymin Stingley, S.S., and 23 Annette Hilburn (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a response. (ECF No. 33.) For the reasons set 24 forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ request. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 The Court need not recount all background facts as they are fully set forth in the Court’s 3 March 11, 2024 Order. (ECF No. 46.) In short, this action concerns the officer-involved death of 4 Sherrano Stingley, a 48-year-old mentally ill Black man. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.