Taylor
(PC) Hodge v. Taylor
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JASON ROBERT HODGE, Case No. 2:19-cv-01956-DAD-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
14 TAYLOR, et al.,
15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has been provided with numerous extensions of time to file a response to 18 defendants’ motion for summary judgment, yet he has failed to do so. See ECF Nos. 120, 122, 19 123, & 126. Out of an abundance of caution and in light of plaintiff’s pro se status, plaintiff will 20 be afforded a final opportunity to file an opposition or statement of defendants’ motion for 21 summary judgment, which was filed six months ago. See ECF No. 114. Should plaintiff fail to 22 comply with this order, I expect to recommend that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 24 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is 25 a harsh penalty,…