Quick

(PC) Torres v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20241:22-cv-01536California1,409 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND 12 RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS v. THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND JAYSON QUICK, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 14 COURT’S ORDERS Defendants. 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 17 18 Plaintiff Edward Torres is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For reasons stated below, the Court recommends that 20 this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on November 30, 2022. (ECF No. 23 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that the following claims should 24 proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against 25 defendants Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, Prince, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.