Quick

(PC) Torres v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20241:22-cv-01536California1,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS v. THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND JAYSON QUICK, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDERS Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 17 Plaintiff Edward Torres is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For reasons stated below, the Court recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on November 30, 2022. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that the following claims should proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, Prince, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.