Earls

(PC) Brown v. Earls

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20242:22-cv-00359California503 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, Case No. 2:22-cv-00359-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DENYING DEFENDANTS’ PENDING

MOTIONS AS MOOT AND DIRECTING

14 D. EARLS Jr., et al.¸ THE CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER

15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 29 & 38 16

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

17

THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR

18 FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDERS

19

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

20 DAYS 21 22 On October 10, 2023, defendants filed a motion to compel. ECF No. 29. On February 8, 23 2024, after plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to that motion, I 24 ordered him to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days. ECF 25 No. 37. Plaintiff did not comply with that order. Accordingly, on March 19, 2024, I ordered him 26 to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.