Dickson

Dickson v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20242:23-cv-01812California771 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10

11 GLENN DICKSON, individually, and on Case No. 2:23-cv-01812-MCE-AC 12 behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING JOINT 13 STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY Plaintiff, DISMISS PUTATIVE CLASS CLAIMS, 14 WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO v. F.R.C.P. 23(e), 41(a)(1) AND STAY THE 15 ACTION UNTIL THE PARTIES RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a VOLUNTARILY DISMISS THE 16 Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10 INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS AND inclusive, COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 17 Defendants. 18 19

20 On August 24, 2023, Defendant Rheem Manufacturing removed this action from the 21 County of Sacramento Superior Court. [Dkt. No. 1.] Shortly thereafter, the Parties informed the 22 Court they would be attending mediation on April 2, 2024, and submitted a stipulation to stay the 23 action and continue the deadlines for Defendant to respond to the Complaint and for Plaintiff to 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.