Mathison

Mathison v. Shannon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20241:24-cv-00427California754 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL WAYNE MATHISON, 1:24-cv-00427-KES-SAB

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

10 v. RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 4)

11 ZACHARY SHANNON, et al., ORDER DISREGARDING DOCUMENT

FILED BY NON-ATTORNEY ON

12 Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S BEHALF (ECF No. 6)

13 ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

14 PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 45

DAYS

15 45 DAY DEADLINE

16

17 On March 29, 2024, a non-attorney signed and filed a complaint and application to 18 proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff. (ECF No. 1.) On April 19, 2024, the Court 19 issued findings and recommendations recommending that the action be dismissed because neither 20 filing was signed by Plaintiff or an attorney. (ECF No. 4.) The Court afforded Plaintiff thirty 21 days to file objections or, alternatively, to cure the deficiencies in his complaint. (Id. at 2.) 22 On May 3, 2024, a notice was filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.