Castaneda

Castaneda v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20241:23-cv-00068California2,543 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS E. CASTANEDA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00068-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

13 v. (Doc. 24) 14 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Currently before the Court is a discovery dispute that the parties have agreed to submit to 18 the Court for adjudication through the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. 19 Background 20 Plaintiff Luis E. Castaneda commenced this action with the filing of a complaint in state 21 court on or about October 7, 2022. (Doc. 2 Ex. 1). Defendants named in the state court suit 22 removed the action to this Court on January 13, 2023. (Doc. 2). After the case was scheduled 23 and nonexpert discovery extended on the parties’ stipulated request (see Doc. 19), on February 9, 24 2024, Plaintiff filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) asserting claims against 25 Defendants Bakersfield Police Department, Brockett Mueller, and Brendan Thebeau. (Doc. 20). 26 In the FAC, Plaintiff alleges Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.