Moreno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 2:22-cv-00650-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST MOTION

TO COMPEL AND HIS MOTION FOR

D. MORENO, et al., DISCOVERY SANCTIONS, GRANTING

HIS SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL IN

Defendants. PART, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

16 ECF Nos. 42, 43, 53, & 57

18 19 20 Plaintiff brought this action on April 12, 2022, and, on January 23, 2023, I found that the second amended complaint stated a viable Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against defendants Moreno, Haynes, Smith, and Williams. ECF No. 15. Now pending are two of plaintiff’s motions to compel, ECF Nos. 42 & 53, and one motion for discovery sanctions, ECF No. 43. I will deny his first motion to compel and his motion for sanctions. His second motion to compel will be granted in part. Finally, plaintiff’s motion for extension, ECF No. 57, of time will be denied. 28 …