Moreno

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 2:22-cv-00650-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST MOTION

TO COMPEL AND HIS MOTION FOR

14 D. MORENO, et al., DISCOVERY SANCTIONS, GRANTING

HIS SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL IN

15 Defendants. PART, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

16 ECF Nos. 42, 43, 53, & 57 17

18 19 20 21 Plaintiff brought this action on April 12, 2022, and, on January 23, 2023, I found that the 22 second amended complaint stated a viable Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against 23 defendants Moreno, Haynes, Smith, and Williams. ECF No. 15. Now pending are two of 24 plaintiff’s motions to compel, ECF Nos. 42 & 53, and one motion for discovery sanctions, ECF 25 No. 43. I will deny his first motion to compel and his motion for sanctions. His second motion to 26 compel will be granted in part. Finally, plaintiff’s motion for extension, ECF No. 57, of time will 27 be denied. 28 1 …