Nixon

(PC) Almaguer Jr. v. Nixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20241:24-cv-00399California2,280 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

26 A. The Complaint 27 Plaintiff is an inmate at North Kern State Prison (“NKSP”). ECF No. 1 at 1. His 28 1 complaint names several employees at NKSP as Defendants in this action. See id. at 1, 3. The 2 claims generally stem from Defendants allegedly giving him incorrect medication on March 6, 3 2024, and/or their failure to properly respond to the error. See generally id. at 3, 5-6. 4 Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief in the form of staff training, and the firing, reprimand 5 and/or pay cut for certain Defendants. ECF No. 1 at 8. He also seeks compensatory damages in 6 the amount of $250,000.00. Id. 7 B. Date of Filing 8 Although the events of which Plaintiff contends constituted violations of his constitutional 9 rights occurred on March 6, 2024, (see ECF No. 1 at 2-3, 5) (date Plaintiff states his rights were 10 violated), it was on March 23, 2024, that Plaintiff filed the instant complaint.1 See ECF No. 1 at 11 10 (signature date on complaint). In the complaint, Plaintiff states that there is a grievance 12 procedure at NKSP, but that he has not completed it. Id. at 2. He provides no excuse for not 13 having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.