Scottini
(PC) Robinson v. Scottini
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVAUGHN ROBINSON, No. 2:22-cv-1641 KJM CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTTINI, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s motion to compel is before the court. (ECF No. 45.) As set forth below, plaintiff’s motion is denied. The Parties’ Positions In plaintiff’s motion to compel, plaintiff declares that on January 18, 2024, plaintiff signed a “single production of document request,” but has not yet received a response. (ECF No. 45 at 1.) Plaintiff states that the request sought “any and all videos on B-7 when [defendant] worked and April through May. . . .” (Id.) Further, plaintiff claims that a meet and confer would be too late to meet the discovery deadline. (Id.) In opposition, defendant objects that no such discovery request was received and plaintiff did not provide a copy of the purported discovery request or a copy of the proof of service corroborating plaintiff…