Scottini
(PC) Robinson v. Scottini
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAVAUGHN ROBINSON, No. 2:22-cv-1641 KJM CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SCOTTINI, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s motion to compel is before the 18 court. (ECF No. 45.) As set forth below, plaintiff’s motion is denied. 19 The Parties’ Positions 20 In plaintiff’s motion to compel, plaintiff declares that on January 18, 2024, plaintiff signed 21 a “single production of document request,” but has not yet received a response. (ECF No. 45 at 22 1.) Plaintiff states that the request sought “any and all videos on B-7 when [defendant] worked 23 and April through May. . . .” (Id.) Further, plaintiff claims that a meet and confer would be too 24 late to meet the discovery deadline. (Id.) 25 In opposition, defendant objects that no such discovery request was received and plaintiff 26 did not provide a copy of the purported discovery request or a copy of the proof of service 27 corroborating plaintiff…