Litwin
Litwin v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAN LITWIN, Case No. 2:23-CV-01885 DJC-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
v. (ECF No. 20) WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES
INSURANCE COMPANY,
14 Defendant.
16 Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company moves to compel Plaintiff Jan Litwin to make his initial disclosures and to respond to Defendant’s interrogatories and requests for production of documents, and to deem admitted Defendant’s requests for admission.1 Def. Mot. Compel (ECF No. 20, 20-14). Pursuant to Local Rule 251(e), Defendant’s motion is excepted from the requirement for a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement and was noticed for an April 30, 2024 hearing. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(e); Def. Mot. at 2 (ECF No. 20-14); Declaration of Karl A. Schulz (ECF No. 20-1). Though Plaintiff’s response was due April 23, 2024, Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant’s motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(e); Docket. As a result, the Court vacated the April 30 hearing and…