Unknown

(PC) Hatton v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20242:23-cv-02996California327 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD JAMES BRUCE HATTON, Case No. 2:23-cv-02996-JDP (PC) Sr., 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14

UNKNOWN,

15 Defendant. 16

17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 5, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 23 days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 25 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 26 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 27 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.