Taylor

(HC) Flores v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20241:24-cv-00180California1,661 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FELIX NACEDO FLORES, No. 1:24-cv-00180-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 14 TO GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS

15 WARDEN, FCI-MENDOTA, [Doc. 8] 16 Respondent. [FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE] 17 18 19 Petitioner is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 20 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 21 On February 7, 2024, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. 22 (Doc. 1.) On February 9, 2024, the Court issued an order directing Respondent to file a response 23 to the petition. (Doc. 5.) On April 8, 2024, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition for 24 failure to exhaust administrative remedies, failure to state a claim, and for mootness insofar as 25 Petitioner has been released from custody. (Doc. 8.) For reasons discussed below, the Court 26 recommends that the motion be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.