Domino

Domino v. California Correctional Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20241:19-cv-01790California1,514 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JUNE M. DOMINO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01790-LHR-SKO

11 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND

GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

12 v. (Doc. 82) 13 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTION & REHABILITATION,

14 Defendant. 15 _____________________________________/

16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 On April 15, 2024, W. Anthony Willoughby, Esq., of Willoughby & Associates (“Attorney 18 Willoughby”), attorney for Plaintiff June Domino (“Plaintiff”), filed a motion to withdraw as 19 Plaintiff’s counsel of record. (Doc. 82.) Plaintiff filed a response on May 3, 2024, in which she 20 indicates that she has “no objections to Attorney Willoughby withdrawing from this case.” (Doc. 21 87 at 1.) Defendant California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) did not file 22 a response. The matter is therefore deemed unopposed. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). 23 After having reviewed the motion, supporting material, and response, the matter is deemed 24 suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.