Cordova

Cordova v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20241:24-cv-00482California425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZENAIDA CORDOVA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00482-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE

NOTICE WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE

GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al., RELATED

Defendants. (ECF No. 5)

DEADLINE: MAY 20, 2024 17 On April 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action against Defendants Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares. (ECF No. 1.) The Court’s review of the complaint suggests that this case may be related to other actions pending in this district. On April 26, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 123 and file a notice of related cases or, alternatively, a notice explaining why the action should not be related no later than May 10, 2024. (ECF No. 5.) The deadline has now expired, and Plaintiff has not filed the required notice nor requested an extension of time to do so. Local Rule 110…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.