Cordova

Cordova v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20241:24-cv-00482California425 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ZENAIDA CORDOVA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00482-JLT-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS

13 v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE

NOTICE WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE

14 GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al., RELATED

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 5)

16 DEADLINE: MAY 20, 2024 17 18 On April 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action against Defendants Greg 19 Rodriguez and Michael Pallares. (ECF No. 1.) The Court’s review of the complaint suggests that 20 this case may be related to other actions pending in this district. On April 26, 2024, the Court 21 issued an order requiring Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 123 and file a notice of related cases 22 or, alternatively, a notice explaining why the action should not be related no later than May 10, 23 2024. (ECF No. 5.) The deadline has now expired, and Plaintiff has not filed the required notice 24 nor requested an extension of time to do so. 25 Local Rule 110…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.